The Day “Strategic Ambiguity” Died

Jul18_Stratgeic Ambiguity

The hits just keep on coming.

There is a new sheriff in town, the old order is crumbling, and we are afraid the world is going to become much more unstable in the next few years.  Assets markets are incapable of discounting or pricing it in.

President Trump Throws Montenegro Under The Bus

In an interview with Fox’s Tucker Carlson last night, President Trump seemed to question the raison d’être of NATO and foreign alliances in general.

Tucker:  So membership in NATO obligates the members to defend any member that is attacked.  So let’s say Montenegro, who joined last year,  is attacked, why should my son go to Montenegro to defend it from attack?

President Trump:  I understand what you are saying. I have asked the same question. You know Montenegro is a tiny country with very strong people… They may get aggressive, and congratulations you are in World War III…But that is the way it was set up, don’t forget I just got here. 

There are errors and misrepresentations in the above, such as NATO’s Article 5, which has only been invoked once in the aftermath of 9/11, and does not apply when the NATO member is the aggressor.

NATO Expansion Was A Mistake

Before going further let us state for the record, we believe the expansion of NATO without including Russia was a big mistake, unnecessarily provocative, and ruined the West chances of bringing Russia “in.”

With the fall of the Soviet Union and the sudden shift in the military balance in Europe in the early 1990’s, NATO faced an existential crisis.  Rather than winding down, the conventional wisdom was that NATO must go “out of area or out of business.” Bureaucracies don’t die easily.

The Russian backlash to NATO’s expansion was devastating.  In 1991, 80 percent of the Russian public had a favorable opinion of the United States.  After the expansion of the alliance and bombing of Serbia in 1999 without UN Security Council authorization,  Russians had a negative view of America.  In 2000, Vladimir Putin was elected president of the Russian Federation.

George Kennen

Listen to George Kennen in 1998, the architect of America’s successful containment of the Soviet Union and one of America’s great statesmen of the 20th century, who was “present at the creation” of NATO, and authored the anonymous 1947 Foreign Affairs article, signed ”X,” defining America’s cold-war policy for 40 years,

”I think it is the beginning of a new cold war,” said Mr. Kennan from his Princeton home. ”I think the Russians will gradually react quite adversely and it will affect their policies. I think it is a tragic mistake. There was no reason for this whatsoever. No one was threatening anybody else. This expansion would make the Founding Fathers of this country turn over in their graves. We have signed up to protect a whole series of countries, even though we have neither the resources nor the intention to do so in any serious way. [NATO expansion] was simply a light-hearted action by a Senate that has no real interest in foreign affairs.” – NY Times, 1998

So, to some extent, we agree on many of the philosophical tenets that we think what President Trump believes.  The problem lies in implementation and execution.

Just as, we believe, trade disagreements should be settled in a rules-based multilateral framework, such at the WTO.

We  also agree with another American president about being suspicious and trying to avoid  “foreign entanglements.”   The web of foreign entanglements among European nations led to World War I, a war that nobody wanted.

The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. – George Washington

Xi’s One China Policy

What worries us about the Tucker Carlson interview is a potentially destabilizing effect on geopolitics, especially with China.

How do you think Xi Jinping, Trump’s new BFF,  who is becoming increasingly  aggressive about his “one China” policy, interpreted the interview?

Maybe something like:

“Why should my son go to Montenegro Taiwan to defend it from attack?”

Wars begin with misperception and miscalculation.

Saddam Hussein misread ambiguous messages from the U.S. ambassador believing he could get away with invading Kuwait.  In 1950, North Korea may have misinterpreted the Truman administration policy statement, that South Korea was outside the American defense perimeter in the Pacific.

We believe the world is becoming more unstable by the day especially with messages such as the one sent by the president last night.

We don’t like foreign entanglements, though we believe the U.S. should be the first among equals in the community of nations.  We also doubt the American public, at the end, of the day, is willing to send “their sons to defend Taiwan” but those are cards we have been dealt by past leaders.  To send mixed signals now only destabilizes and invites aggression.

We also sense that President Xi believes that even more than he did yesterday.

Taiwan may be about to get hot, hot, hot in the next year after last night’s Commander in Chief’s ambiguous message on defense treaties.

To stave off an eventual crisis, both capitals must work to ensure that Taiwan does not stand alone, that Taiwan’s people continue to believe in the feasibility of a free and (de facto) independent future, and that the United States and Taiwan’s armed forces can deter and, if necessary, defeat Chinese aggression. – The American Interest 

Sidetracked By Geopolitics

We apologize to our readers for being sidetracked with geopolitics and will get back to economics and the markets tomorrow.  It is imperative investors and traders understand the magnitude and seriousness of, what we believe, is taking place in the world.

The post-war order is crumbling before our very eyes (or, maybe, we are just seeing pink elephants in the clouds).

Political and geopolitical risk is rising rapidly.  The warning lights are flashing.

UPDATE (July 22) – Looks like Fox took down original video and replaced with the following.

 

 

This entry was posted in China, Geopolitical, Trade War, Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

32 Responses to The Day “Strategic Ambiguity” Died

  1. R.D.Harper says:

    I believe that you are overreacting as you always do, and as a teenaged does when a guy talks to his girl friend. The long game being played here is much more complicated than your view of the world. Every new Pres. wants to meet the “rulers” of our allies. Makes sense, know who you are speaking to. Maybe it makes sense to know your enemies too? We have a little dust up with China on trade and what are the fair rules (stealing copyrighted and trade-marked materials?, manipulating currencies? etc.). So who is China turning to but Russia. So let’s make friends with Russia, we hold more cards with R than C does with R. You don’t like how T talks to NATO on spending…Bush and Obama spoke nicely and asked for them to meet the treaty terms. I think we got one of their 4 fingers, you can figure out which one. Lesson is, don’t ask would you please, be a little nasty. This whole article is a science-fiction of oh, this could happen, and oh that could happen…. And we could be hit with an asteroid tomorrow. Just sit back and watch the hands that are dealt and how they are played. This article is either Sci-fi or false news. Your choice!

    • macromon says:

      Thanks, RD, for comment and I appreciate you can trust that you can speak so bluntly to me. I wish I could believe Trump had a long game. I don’t understand why NATO needs to spend $1 trillion on defense? Russia is not that big of a threat. One trillion to prevent a crazed Islamo fascist Parisian taxi driver from plowing into a sidewalk? Come on. NATO should be disbanded after the EU puts they deploy their joint defense force, which may be never. Don’t think I write Sci-Fi but only time will tell. Will you remember if I am right?

    • macromon says:

      BTW,

      WORLD

      CHINA TRAINS FOR TAIWAN INVASION IN MILITARY DRILLS THAT COULD COVER ENTIRE ISLAND

      BY TOM O’CONNOR ON 7/18/18 AT 5:35 PM

      https://www.newsweek.com/china-trains-taiwan-invasion-military-drills-cover-entire-island-1031807

      Just sayin’

  2. Pingback: The Day “Strategic Ambiguity” Died – iftttwall

  3. Pingback: The Day “Strategic Ambiguity” Died | peoples trust toronto

  4. Pingback: The Day "Strategic Ambiguity" Died – students loan

  5. Pingback: The Day “Strategic Ambiguity” Died – Viralmount

  6. Pingback: The Day "Strategic Ambiguity" Died - Biedex: Stockmarket News. Trading Tips, Realtime Quotes, Technical Analysis.

  7. Pingback: The Day “Strategic Ambiguity” Died | Real Patriot News

  8. Pingback: The Day “Strategic Ambiguity” Died – TCNN: The Constitutional News Network

  9. Pingback: The Day "Strategic Ambiguity" Died | Newzsentinel

  10. Pingback: The Day "Strategic Ambiguity" Died | StockTalk Journal

  11. Pingback: Is Trump Starting To Lean On The Fed Or Setting It Up? – students loan

  12. Pingback: Is Trump Starting To Lean On The Fed Or Setting It Up? | peoples trust toronto

  13. Pingback: Is Trump Starting To Lean On The Fed Or Setting It Up? – TCNN: The Constitutional News Network

  14. Pingback: NATO’s purpose ended with fall of Soviet Union. Instead of gracefully retiring, NATO decided to expand and failed to include Russia. This was a tragic mistake, unnecessarily provocative, and ruined West’s chances of bringing Russia into the fo

  15. Pingback: NATO’s purpose ended with fall of Soviet Union. Instead of gracefully retiring, NATO decided to expand and failed to include Russia. This was a tragic mistake, unnecessarily provocative, and ruined West’s chances of bringing Russia into the fo

  16. Cephalonia25 says:

    Keep the geopol coming!!!! Good stuff

  17. Pingback: The Taiwan Strait Is Getting Hot, Hot, Hot…

  18. Pingback: The Taiwan Strait Is Getting Hot, Hot, Hot… | peoples trust toronto

  19. Pingback: The Taiwan Strait Is Getting Hot, Hot, Hot… – TCNN: The Constitutional News Network

  20. Pingback: The Taiwan Strait Is Getting Hot, Hot, Hot... - Novus Vero

  21. Pingback: The Taiwan Strait Is Getting Hot, Hot, Hot… – Wall Street Karma

  22. Pingback: The Taiwan Strait Is Getting Hot, Hot, Hot… | Real Patriot News

  23. Pingback: The Taiwan Strait Is Getting Hot, Hot, Hot... | StockTalk Journal

  24. Pingback: The Taiwan Strait Is Getting Hot, Hot, Hot... | ValuBit

  25. Pingback: The Taiwan Strait Is Getting Hot, Hot, Hot… – The Conservative Insider

  26. Pingback: Watching Gold – Conspiracy News

  27. Pingback: Watching Gold | peoples trust toronto

  28. Pingback: Watching Gold | Newzsentinel

  29. Pingback: Watching Gold | Global Macro Monitor – Gold Aim Pro

  30. Pingback: Watching Gold | Real Patriot News

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s